Sunday, March 26, 2017

CONSUMERS OF ASSUMPTION

March 26, 2017
Lent 4
(prayer)
Friday was supposed to start out a bit more relaxed than normal.  A professional development day for Blackgold Schools means that spring break started a day early. 
That meant that only the university student in the house had to pushed out the door in time.
Ben has an 8am class, so Patti or I (usually Patti) drive him to the Alex arena to catch the 7:05 bus into Edmonton.  It was chilly on Friday morning, so the car was started at 6:45 to begin to defrost the windows. 
At 6:55, we discovered it had been stolen.
Yes... the keys were in the car and the door was unlocked.  Stupid - I know.
//
//
I really do believe that people are kind and good by nature.  I do like to assume the best about people... especially strangers.
Call me naïve, but I am trying very hard to respond to this theft (and all of the inconveniences it has caused) without me losing my faith in humanity.
Theologically, you might know that I am a big fan of Genesis 1:27 - So God created humankind in his image, in the image of God he created them (NRSV).
I hold to this ancient belief that we bear the image of our creator.  If I were to lose my faith in humanity, I may very well lose my faith in God.
//
I will still proclaim that assuming that people are inherently good is a good assumption to make.
And yet, I am fully aware of the dangers of assuming.  As they say, the very spelling of the word dictates the pitfalls when we "assume" - it can make an a** of u and me.
//
//
"Assumptions" don't just spring up out of nowhere.
I believe that most assumptions are born out of experience. 
As we go through life - as we encounter different people in different situations - we begin to notice patterns.
After a bit of experience, we begin to expect to see patterns repeat themselves.
Assumptions are the default patterns our experience has taught us to expect.
//
At its best, this can give us useful intuitive skills.
At its worse, it can make us racist or sexist (or any number of other -ists).
//
//
//
Samuel had anointed Saul as the first ever king of Israel.  It marked an evolution of the Hebrew people:  they changed from being a loose ancestral affiliation - a tribal confederacy - to being a nation (like it's neighbours).
The Hebrew kingdom began with such hope and promise, but King Saul became corrupt... and Samuel grieved his role in establishing the kingdom.
//
Even God had withdrawn divine support for King Saul.  Regardless, Saul remained king and the people of Israel continued to be impacted by his faithless and corrupt regime.
Samuel, you have grieved
over Saul long enough.
It is time to show you my next king.
Fill your flask with oil
and go to the Land of Judah.
Find Jesse of Bethlehem.
You will annoint one of his sons as
the next King of Israel.
//
Jesse had at least 10 children: eight sons and two daughters.
When Samuel saw Jesse's sons, Eliab stood out. 
Now, he looked like a king.
Eliab has to be one!
You cannot see a king
with your eyes. 
It is not about how tall he is
or anything about his appearance.
It is what is in the heart
that matters.
Eliab... no.
Abinadad... no.
Shammah... no.
Seven sons in total... and not one of them had the heart of a king.
Are these all of your sons?
All but the youngest.
David is with the flocks right now.
When David returned from the field, he did look young.  He was good-looking in a healthy, dreamy eye sort of way.  But Samuel knew that none of that mattered.
This was the one.
Samuel's faith told him that.
The horn of oil was brought out and David was anointed by Samuel in a special ceremony.
The Old Testament reading this morning said that The Spirit of God was with David in a very strong way from that day forward.
David didn't become King of Israel that day.  Saul's reign would last for many more years.  When we read on in the text, Saul's story continues to unfold,  but so does David's. 
With the anointing of the shepherd boy, God's choice had been made.  It would only be a matter of time.
//
Samuel's instincts of how he would identify the next king of Israel were not quite right.  His assumptions were challenged until he looked beyond the surface and could see the depth of the true person inside.
//
//
//
"God blesses the truly faithful; God rejects and punishes the wicked."
This theology has been popular in every era of biblical history... from Genesis to Revelation.  It has been preached a lot in the two millennia since Jesus' resurrection.
It is expressed in writings of prophets, psalmists; it is in the gospels and in letters of early Christianity.
//
Every single obscenely wealthy mega-church TV preacher uses it as a justification for the fleet of luxury cars and mansions.  See the spoils (I mean blessings) of being truly committed to God.
This is not just a judeo-christian concept.  We sometimes use the ancient sanskrit word, karma, to describe this theology in action.  Hinduism teaches: As a man himself sows, so he himself reaps ... The fruit is of the same quality as the action.
"God blesses the truly faithful and punishes the wicked" may be a popular belief in some circles.  But it is an indefensible theology unless you close your eyes to the realities in the world.
There are consequences to the choices we make in our lives... good and kind and compassionate choices do often reap benefits for (not only the recipients but also) the givers.  And those who choose less honourable ways of living often find those choices biting them in the butt.
But, we all know the real world truth that... devout faithfulness is not an inoculation against suffering.  And... history (past and present) is littered with evil, wicked, greedy, violent people enjoying life far greater than their choices and actions can justify.
Every minister (myself included... many times) has be asked the phrase that Rabbi Harold Kushner echoed in the title for his 1981 best-selling book: why do bad things happen to good people?
The question comes from a theology that is engrained into our minds: God blesses the faithful and causes the wicked to suffer.
For many people, the collision of this assertion and the realities of their experience leads to a serious crisis of faith.
Does this sound familiar?
I go to church.  I read my bible. 
I pray.  I love my neighbours.
But my life just sucks. 
It is one bad surprise after another.  I can't catch a break. 
What is wrong with me? 
Why is God doing this to me?
What am I doing wrong?
//
As engrained as the blessings-curse theology is in our biblical tradition, an opposite theology is part of our story as well.
The whole book of Job is a challenge to that belief.
As is our Gospel story from John chapter nine today.
Rabbi Jesus, who sinned,
this man or his parents,
that he was born blind.
The disciples were taking the karma belief system even a step further... it is not just ourselves that will suffer for our lack of faithfulness, but our children as well - a birth defect, a life long disability is a direct result of the bad faith choices of a previous generations.
Is it not enough that they have to believe that wicked people will suffer the consequences of their own actions, but that innocent babies must justify this philosophy as well?
These kind of assumptions really do make an ass of u and me!
//
Jesus' response to his followers' assumption was to show them how absurd that way of thinking is.
In the wonder and mystery of Jesus ability to heal, he made a salve of spit and dirt and rubbed it into the blind one's eyes.  It must have hurt (suffering upon suffering). 
There was a site nearby where the waters of the Gihon Spring had been diverted into the city for easier access. 
The man found his way to this Pool of Siloam to wash out his eyes.
Even as the pain of the scratches on his eyeballs lingered, he experienced a new sensation: brightness, shapes, colours.  Remember, he was born blind. 
Was this... sight?
//
The man (born blind) could see.
A miracle!
But... notice what is missing from the story.  One chapter earlier in John, a crowd was ready to stone a woman for the sin of adultery (Jn8:3-11).  With an interesting choice of words, Jesus convinces the crowd to let her go.  All he asks of the woman is to "go and sin no more".  She had her slate whipped clean.  She avoided the punishment because her sins had been forgiven.  "Your accusers are all gone, and I don't condemn you either.  Go and sin no more."
If the healing of the blind man (in chapter nine) was a result of his sins being forgiven, Jesus never mentions it.  In fact, Jesus says it is a sign of the Glory of God made manifest in in their midst.  The healing spoke to Jesus' authority not to any new status of faithfulness of the man who came away from the Pool of Siloam understanding (for the first time) what the word 'blue' meant.
//
//
As I said earlier, we create our own assumptions based on our experiences.  We project that reliable, repeated patterns will occur again in the future.
Typically, these internal assumptions serve us well, even if we are forced to realize every once and a while that there are exceptions to every rule.
//
It seems to me that a greater concern is the fact that - sometimes - we can be quick to take in the assumptions of others, without the benefits of a critical reflection on our own experiences.
Or worse, we accept, as gospel fact, the assumptions of others - in contradiction to what we see around us.
We become consumers of assumptions because they will make life easier to understand.  We like to be told how things are and why they are that way.
I believe that theology without thought is bad theology.  I don't feel that I need to take it as far as pure rationalism, but I do understand why some people do.
I accept that not everything can be fully explained; that there are aspects to this existence that defy logic and reason.  The churchy words that I use to describe this are mystery and wonder.
Faith is the bridge that helps us connect the dots of life.
I will be the first to admit that not everything I hold as true and authoritative in my life makes sense.  But, I do need some of it to make sense.
I exist somewhere in between Blind Faith and Cold Rationalism.
I think this is a bit about what Samuel learned at Jesse's estate.  Life and faith has to be able to look beyond the five physical senses.
There is more to a person that what can be seen in a photograph.
Samuel learned... that the Eyes of God see more deeply than we can fully imagine or understand.  There is more to each of us than...
·         how we look, or
·         what accent we speak, or
·         what we smell like, or
·         how smooth our skin is, or even
·         how salty our tears might taste.
We are body, mind, and spirit... and more.  We are the sum total of our experiences and how those events have made us feel ... feelings are metaphysical - beyond the physical - beyond what other people's most faithful observations can fully understand.
//
//
Somewhere along the way, Samuel had picked up an assumption of how a king should look.
Somewhere along the way, Jesus' disciples had glommed on to the idea that life's sufferings (even multi-generational sufferings) were solely the result of a lack of faith... a consequence of sin.
Both Samuel and the disciples were challenged to see things differently: to set aside their propensity to be consumers of assumptions and become consumers of the graceful presence of God.
God's love for us us not dependent on the choices we make, or the experiences (good and bad) that come our way in this life.
The promise - I see throughout the scriptures and especially in the ministry of Jesus - is that the compassion of God does not involve any test of worthiness.  God loves because.. God is love.
//
In the exciting and boring times, God is with us.
In times of joy and worry, we are not alone.
We cannot force God to hate us, by any action or thought... even those that are based in our own hate and disdain for everything Jesus stood for.
None of us will avoid hard times by saying the perfect prayer or memorizing every verse in the bible.  We can not live in perfect bliss 24/7 simply by performing selfless acts of charity.
//
We may choose to make the world a better place because that offers a shared reward in the small differences it makes in the hearts of ourselves and others.
We have been created to be creatures of free will.
There are natural consequences to choices we make: some significant, some inconsequential; some immediately impactful, some delayed. 
But in our sharing of this globe, the ebbs and flows of life are far more complex.  We get swept up by the consequences of the choices of others through not fault of our own.
The end result is that every life has both joy and sadness.   And for most of us (all of us?), there are times when the impacts are skewed too much toward the difficult edge of that spectrum that life becomes almost unbearable and our beliefs are called into question.
//
The hope of our faith is that companion always.  As the Apostle Paul wrote: Nothing can separate us from God's love: not death, not life; no power in heaven or on earth.  God's love does not change over time.  It is the same in every place.  There is nothing in all creation that will ever be able to separate us from the love of God which is ours through Christ Jesus our Lord. (Rm8:38-39)
//
My hope is that no one will try to get me to assume otherwise.
//
//
Let us pray:
O God, you call us to look in new and fresh ways at the world around us.  Open our eyes that we may see.  Amen.


#371VU “Open My Eyes”

Sunday, March 19, 2017

RELIABLE SOURCE

March 19, 2017
Lent 3
(prayer)
You may know that I am a self-confessed news junkie.  I like to know what's going on in the world around me
Unless a CFL game is on - or if it is a Survivor or Big Brother or Better Call Saul night - if you turn on my TV, it will likely be set to one of the Canadian or US 24-hour news channels - the ultimate reality TV.
Consuming news has changed a lot over my lifetime.
I used to read the Edmonton Journal cover to cover every morning.  Now I almost never do.
Over the last couple of years, facebook has actually become my main source for breaking news. 
I still connect to old and new friends as a social aspect of the social network (following interesting and inate aspects of their lives) and I have access to several church-related people and pages...but as I scroll down most of my news feed is news
I regularly see updates from TV news channels, newspapers, blogs and several Internet news sites. 
I intentionally follow pages from across the political spectrum (I see CBC and FoxNews; the Huffington Post and Breitbart; MSNBC and the Leduc Rep)
Add to this all of the other articles I get to see because facebook friends of mine like or share articles from both well-known and obscure sources and... I have plenty of ways to feed my addiction to news.
//
The real challenge when consuming news today is... can you rely on the source of the information to give you some semblance of the truth?  Is it real for fake news? Are they facts or alternative-facts?
Now-a-days, unfortunately, unvarnished reporting is hard to find simply on its own.  The details of what has happened and the discovery of evidence is, so often, very quickly followed by someone's opinion about what we should think it means.  Reporting and editorializing have become (pretty much) the same thing.
I sometimes wonder if there are any reporters left or if all we have are commentators.
//
How can we decide what are reliable sources?
//
//
My experience is that people seem to define reliability based on how much they like the editorial opinions that accompany the basic news.
If we like the opinion of the commentator, it is reliable news.
If we don't like that perspective, it must be fake news.
As a result, I am afraid that too many people are less interested in being impacted by new news and more interested in hearing about the world through the lense of their already held beliefs and opinions.
//
As spring hints that it is on its way, the green thumbs among us can remind us that just having nutrient rich soil is not enough.  We won't see the flowers unless their roots can drink fresh water and their leaves can be bathed in warm, new light.
//
In the same way...
How can we expect our minds and hearts to grow if we don't allow them access to what is fresh and new?
//
//
//
Even though they had access to a deep, reliable well, the fields couldn't meet the food needs of Jacob's family or their livestock without new rains to replenish the drying and dying soil.
But, Egypt had stores of excess grain and was willing to sell.
Only three generations after Abraham had settled in a new land after venturing away from his ancestral home (buoyed by a promise of God), Jacob's family took up residence in Egypt... chosing to remain there even after the drought ended.
Several hundred years later, there was an identifiable community within Egyptian society known as the people of Jacob (or - based on his nickname - the People of Israel).  These people continued to nurture a faith in the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
The Israelites were eventually forced into slavery in Egypt, until Moses was able to convince the Pharaoh to let the people go.  The People of Israel set out on (what would turn out to be) a 40 year journey through the Sinai wilderness back the land that Jacob had left centuries earlier.
//
//
Today's reading from Exodus relays a story from that wilderness time.  As they people made the slow, nomadic journey from Egypt to Canaan, they were subject to the limitations of the environments they encountered.  Naturally, they would seek campsites that had adequate food and water supplies.
In our reading today, we heard about the difficulties people experienced when access to water was hard to come by.
They wanted to hold to a faith that God had secured their freedom and was guiding them back to Abraham's land of promise, but times like this tested that faith.  They even began to question whether slavery was a better life:  "Why did you bring us out of Egypt [only] to kill us ... with thirst?"
Just when it looked like, the people were going to have to move on without the rejuvenating rest they needed, a reliable source of water was found: an underground spring was released by chipping away at the mineral deposits that had sealed up the access point.
//
The event would be remembered as an almost miraculous occurance.  So strong was their faith that this exodus was the work of God that - in retrospect - of course, God had guided Moses to the water source and instructed him how to release the spring.
However you interpret the news...
New water led to new life... and renewed faith.
//
//
Thirst is a powerful need that everyone relates to - in every era - no matter where they live in the world.
We may not necessarily know how it feels to have a dying thirst, but even those of us who have easy access to clean drinking water, know what it is like to feel the early pangs of thirst. 
More so... even from our privileged first-world lofts, we can empathize with those who know the realities of a life-and-death struggle with thirst. 
The most basic activity of developmental world outreach work is to dig wells and provide communities with reliable sources of water.
//
//
//
The New Testament reading today from John, chapter four is (perhaps) my favorite water story in the bible. 
It is deep with meaning on a variety of levels.  [If you caught my sermon last week, you will know that the fourth gospel often layers the literal details of a particular narrative with more-than-literal proclamations about who Jesus is for the late first-century early church followers and what impact a faith in Jesus can have on a believer's life.]
//
This morning, we only heard eight verses of a story that is 38 verses long (Jn4:5-42).
There are other aspects of the encounter between Jesus and the Samaritan Woman that are a ripe with meaning that we won't spend much time on today, not because they are unimportant, but because the section we did read is deep with meaning all on its own.
I encourage you to take time to read the full story:  you will get a little bit of an insight to the complexities of the woman's life; you can eavesdrop on a teaching moment that came out of this for Jesus' disciples; and see how, through this woman at the well, many people of the town were impacted by having Jesus among them.
That all begins with... a conversation that two strangers had at the town well in Sychar - a town of Samaria.
//
//
The setting: Jesus was tired from travelling.  He sat, alone, by a well because his disciples had gone to buy food. 
This was not just any well -- this was Jacob's Well.  The well, that - although deep and reliable - could not sustain Jacob's farm and family in the drought that sent them off to Egypt.
Remarkably, Jacob's Well  was still producing water ~1800 years later when Jesus sat there.
Even more remarkably,  go another two millenia down the road and... today, you can visit a site in the West Bank proporting to be that same Jacob's Well (a claim going back at least to the 4th century CE). 
Christians have built a church over the the rock-hewn well (actually a succession of churches over the centuries).  Today it is a sacred site for all of the Abrahamic religions.
Amazingly... "Jacob's Well" still produces water.
//
//
You heard the story from John four...
Jesus mid-day solitude is interrupted when a local comes to draw water.
It is Jesus who opens up the conversation with a request: Give me a drink.  I can't tell from the text whether Jesus asked nicely or if he sort of demanded the water.
Even though, Jesus was thirsty. He didn't draw water himself.  The text later implies that, although there was likely a public rope at the well, there may have been no common bucket for everyone to use. 
I like to picture that it was the sight of that cool, fresh water in the woman's bucket that prompted Jesus to say something like: Hey, I'd like some of that.
As I said, we don't know how nicely Jesus requested the drink, but the woman's response reminds us that Jesus was in foreign territory  (literally).
Her reply strongly implies that she was shocked to hear Jesus say anything to her.
Why is it that you (a Jew), ask me (a woman of Samaria) for a drink?
With these words, she highlights two differences between herself and Jesus that are the possible source of her confusion:
She was a woman;
  Jesus was a man.
She was Samaritan;
  Jesus was Jewish (not clear how she knew... perhaps his clothing, or a distinctive accent ?).
The author of the gospel keys in on the second difference by pointing out to his readers that Jews did not share things in common with Samaritans.
//
What I find interesting (in the limited information that the gospel text provides) is that the implied issue seems to be that it should be Jesus who is concerned.
Why are you even talking to me? The woman expected Jesus to shun her.
//
It reminds me of the practice of having segregated drinking fountains in the pre-1968 US south (and washrooms, bus-restaurant seats, etc.). 
Unless you are a consumer of alternate facts or revisionist history, you'd know that it wasn't the African-American citizens who demanded the segregation. 
Segregation was a product of systemic white-supremacist racism that was undeterred by the elimination of slavery a hundred years earlier.
In the movie Hidden Figures, it wasn't Katherine Gobel who put out a separate coffee maker labeled "colored" a few days after she began working with the Space Task Group.  'She' wasn't worried about being contaminated (somehow) by drinking from the same urn as her white co-workers.
If Katherine had any concern... it was that her co-workers were going to be bothered by her sharing their coffee pot.  That is why she felt the need to take 45 minute bathroom breaks: running to a building (a mile away) to use the closest 'colored washroom'.
//
//
The woman at the well seems to be concerned that Jesus should be concerned: Are you sure that 'you' want to put your lips on a cup that Samaritan Woman uses?
//
That is the basic context of our gospel reading today: by opening his mouth and starting a conversation, Jesus was willingly crossing at least one boundary of systemic cultural and religious bigotry based on a superiority belief.
And even when given an 'out', Jesus doubles down and takes the conversation deeper.
//
//
Like the Nicodemus story from last week, Jesus offers a teaching - in metaphor - that is taken literally:
I asked you for a drink from Jacob's Well to quench my thirst right now, but you're the one who should be asking me for Living Water that can quench your thirst forever.
Sir, give me this water, so that I [won't] have to keep coming here to draw water.
There is a physical reality to what Jesus was saying and... a Spiritual promise.  His words work on the literal and more-than-literal levels.  You can drink from Jacob's Well, but you will be thirsty again; on the other hand, once you take it in, Living Water quenches thirsts forever.
Like Nicodemus last week, the woman tried to make sense of Jesus' teaching only from a physical perspective rather than seeing it through a spiritual lense.
As we can read a bit later in the story, the woman has no reason to see Jesus as a reliable source on spiritual matters: afterall, from her perspective, Jews wrongly believe that the right place to worship is on Mount Zion (at the Temple in Jerusalem), when every Samaritan knows that the ancient and true House of God (Beth-el) is on Mount Gerizim.
Although Jesus was not quite ready to give up his Judea-over-Samaria superiority around the importance of historical locations, he did claim that, because God is Spirit, true worship is spiritually located not physically located.  John 4:21,23 >> The hour is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem. ... The hour is coming, and is now here, when the true worshippers will worship the Father in spirit and truth.
//
This was fresh and refreshing for the Samaritan Woman.  The more she listened to Jesus (the more he gave her insight to her own life),  the more she regarded him as a prophet.
Jesus, increasingly became, for her (and eventually others in Sychar), a reliable source on matters of The Spirit.
//
//
If the woman had limited her definition of truth to assertions that were consistent with her already held beliefs, she would not have been able to detect wisdom and welcome in Jesus' words and actions.
She was open to the notion that there was revelation of the divine that she had not noticed yet.
//
Therein lies a message of encouragement for all of us.
Spiritual growth happens when our current spirituality contains enough humility to allow for enhancements.
//
John Wesley, the founder of the English Methodist movement (which is part of our UCCan heritage), is credited with expressing that there are four aspects to theological and doctrinal (and I would add Spiritual) development:
·         Scripture,
·         Tradition,
·         Reason, and
·         Experience.
The Wesleyan Quadrilateral encourages us to recognize that - in addition to what has been passed on to us (scripture and tradition) - engaging our faith also involves what we can come to know through simply living in this world and... what we think about the totality of our spiritual experiences:
- with our sacred texts,
- the history of faith and
- the new revelations which we can glean by opening our eyes and ears and hearts each day we are blessed to breath creations air.
//
//
As their bellies ached, the Israelites relied on their memories of the full flesh pots and accessible drinking water of Egypt when they looked at the cracked soil and dry rocks of the wilderness.
But... a new experience with a, previously unknown, reliable source of water in the desert, opened their eyes to a presence of God that their memories could not see.
And... as a result, Moses' reputation as a reliable leader was enhanced, as well.
//
//
Jacob's Well was (and had been for 1800 years) a reliable source of water in Samaria.  It was a symbol of the providence of God and the sacredness of that place.
This northern tradition saw itself as challenging the Judean fake news that King David was inspired to build Jerusalem as a holy city and King Solomon was inspired to end the nomadic tradition of a movable tabernacle with the construction of a stone temple.
The woman's long-held belief was that no significant understanding of God could come from an adherent to judaism.  Her understanding of that belief structure was that a jew (like Jesus) would be so offended by her presence that he wouldn't even talk with her.
So, when Jesus put a crack in that wall between them (with an open request for water), the woman's ears began to open.
Once opened, she was able to hear about how new experiences could led to new revelations about a much wider view about the nature of God than her tradition had taught her was possible.
The woman's heart, mind and soul helped her to see Jesus as a reliable source on spiritual.
//
//
All of this relies on an openness expressed in some lines from our United Church Creed:  that...
We believe in God:
    who has created and is creating,
    who has come in Jesus,
       the Word made flesh,
       to reconcile and make new,
    who works in us and others
       by the Spirit.
//
"Our God is not done with us yet."
If we find that a reliable statement, then each moment is an opportunity to quench our thirst for spirit and meaning.
//
Thanks be to God.
//
Let us pray:
Holy One, sometimes we complain; sometimes we pre-judge.  And yet, you still offer us grace upon grace - abundant new life.  Amen.

#144MV  "Like a Healing Steam"