Sunday, January 31, 2016

TOO CLOSE TO SEE

January 31, 2016
Epiphany 4
Jeremiah 1:4-10
Luke 4:21-30
(prayer)
A mother held her new baby and very slowly rocked him back and forth, back and forth, back and forth. And while she held him, she sang:
I'll love you forever,
I'll like you for always,
As long as I'm living
my baby you'll be.

The baby grew. He grew and he grew and he grew. He grew until he was two years old... At night time, when that two-year-old was quiet, she opened the door to his room, crawled across the floor, looked up over the side of his bed; and if he was really asleep she picked him up and rocked him back and forth, back and forth, back and forth. While she rocked him she sang:
I'll love you forever,
I'll like you for always,
As long as I'm living
my baby you'll be.

The little boy grew. He grew and he grew and he grew. He grew until he was nine years old... and [then] a teenager... But at night time...
I'll love you forever,
I'll like you for always,
As long as I'm living
my baby you'll be.

That teenager grew. He grew and he grew and he grew. He grew until he was a grown-up man. He left home and got a house across town. But sometimes on dark nights the mother got into her car and drove across town.  If all the lights in her son's house were out, she opened his bedroom window, crawled across the floor, and looked up over the side of his bed. If that great big man was really asleep she picked him up and rocked him back and forth, back and forth, back and forth. And while she rocked him she sang:
I'll love you forever,
I'll like you for always,
As long as I'm living
my baby you'll be.
from Robert  Munsch's
//
I believe that it is a parent's prerogative to, perpetually, view their children as their babies, no matter what age those babies are.
As of this coming Friday, Patti and I will have two adult sons: they were ages four and two when we first moved to Leduc.  Where has the time gone?
As long as their living,
our babies they'll be.
Even so, it is potentially a wonderful experience for a parent-child relationship to evolve into a positive adult-to-adult connection - rarely do these relationships completely discard the parent-child traditional hierarchy, but (at its healthiest) these relationships do evolve.  Usually that involves a change of expectations on both the part of the child and the parent: the parent releases decision-making control to their child (especially the decisions to make mistakes) - and the child relieves the parent of the responsibility of solving all of their problems.
I can attest (from both sides of that coin) that this transition does not always happen smoothly.  And it does not have to be a linear change.  More often than not, we fluctuate between the extremes of a hands off but loving attitude (tough love) to a let me make everything better one (ooky-pooky).
//
That struggle is illustrated in Ron Howard's 1989 movie, Parenthood.  The family patriarch, played by Jason Robards, feels obligated to do what he can to protect his wild-child youngest son (played by Tom Hulch [hools as in book]).  Frank comes up with a plan to pay off Larry's gambling debts over time in exchange for Larry coming to work with his dad at the family plumbing supply store, only to have to accept his son's wrinkle in the "Frank Buchman" plan - Larry just got a call from a friend and will be leaving for Chili for a new business opportunity.  If that doesn't work out, Larry will consider a career in plumbing supplies.  In the meantime Frank can help him out with a little cash for the road and letting Larry's young son stay with his grandparents.  Don't worry about it, the father says - walking that edge between trying to solve the problem and letting the adult-child make his own decisions.
//
All kidding aside, I have very heartfelt empathy for those who are caught in the ebb and flow of what kind of a relationship adult children have with their parents and visa versa.
When things get difficult, sometimes, all we are left with are less-than-desirable choices: dilemmas in the worst sense of the word.  And no matter what we choose, someone will argue that we are doing the wrong thing.
//
Family relationships are hard.
//
//
//
According to the synoptic gospels, immediately after his baptism, thirty year old Jesus spent several weeks alone in the wilderness struggling with the focus of the next phase of his life. 
From what the gospels imply, Jesus had a fairly normal and predictable life up to that point: he stayed in his hometown (Nazareth) and followed in his father's footsteps and became a carpenter.
Now, in mid-life, Jesus was setting out on a new path.
He had moved from his small farming village to the major fishing port city of Capernaum.
When he came out of the wilderness, Jesus was 'deeply inspired' (filled with the power of the Holy Spirit the author of Luke writes) and traveled around various towns and villages from his new home base by the Sea of Galilee, teaching in various local synagogues.  Reports were that Jesus and his message were well received.  He started to develop a bit of a reputation as a wise and inspiring teacher healer.
If you were here last Sunday, you may recall that Jesus' travels brought him back to the synagogue in his hometown of Nazareth where he (along with others, as was the custom) offered reflections on a text from Isaiah.  The text in question  read:
The spirit of the Lord is upon me because God has anointed me
to preach good news to the poor.
God has sent me to proclaim release to the captives
and recovery of sight to the blind;
to set at liberty those
who are oppress`ed
and to proclaim the acceptable
year of the Lord.
Jesus' reflection:  "Today, this scripture had been fulfilled in your hearing."
The people in the synagogue that Saturday were impressed with Jesus articulate and gracious words: All spoke well of him and were amased, the text reports.
The word "amased" seems to the right word here.  We could read surprised in that sentence based on what Luke reports next.
Wow!  Who would have expected such wisdom from Joseph' son?
Many of these people knew this same Jesus when he was in diapers.  They were neighbours of Joseph and Mary; they knew the rest of Jesus' family in Nazareth. [Mark's version of this story mentions Jesus' sisters and brothers.]  They had heard of what Jesus had been doing and saying in the other towns, but now they were hearing it for themselves.
This new Jesus was not what they had come to expect.
//
Luke is less direct than Mark and Matthew, but clearly, the hometown crowd questioned whether Jesus could live up to the rumours from the other communities.  They wanted to see for themselves: do 'here' the things we heard you did in Capernaum.
But Jesus was not a travelling minstrel, putting on shows for people's amusement.  He was ministering - proclaiming a fresh vision of the nearness of the Realm of God. 
It was a misunderstanding of what he was now about to assume that he would be pulling rabbits of of his hat on request.
The crowds reaction seems extreme, but - according to the text - at least a few of them became quite angry at Jesus' lack of respect for his home town's desires (filled with rage) and ran him out of town.
An group of them even followed him up the hill on the edge of town.  The story goes that they might even have wanted to hurl him off the cliff
As I said, that seems to be an exaggerated reaction.  If it was the case, fortunately cooler heads prevailed and Jesus was allowed to go on his way.
It seems that Jesus was right when he said: no prophet is accepted in his hometown.  A saying that is referenced in all four of the biblical gospels by they way.
//
//
//
If you are familiar with some of my past sermons, you will know that I like to focus on not only the literal details of scripture stories but also the messages they can relay beyond the literal - at the parable or metaphoric level.
//
This week, as I was reading some background materials on today's readings from the Seasons of the Spirit resource from Wood Lake Books, I liked how they pointed out that Jesus found himself (literally) at the edge of his hometown.
Figuratively, that can remind us of a risky, but profoundly impactful, ministry that is lived out on the edge.
Jesus could have played it safe and became the showman that the fickle crowds demanded to save him from the risks of being on the edge.
But Jesus was prepared for this conflict; he had wrestled with this temptation while he was in the wilderness after his baptism.
//
Jesus must have been disappointed that people in his hometown couldn't reconcile the old reputation of his childhood in Nazareth (and his first career as a second generation carpenter) with the emerging reputation of his new midlife career as a travelling teacher-prophet who had moved to the bigger city.
Jesus had to accept that - for the time being at least - they were too close to appreciate the significance of what he was proclaiming - we might use the metaphor that they couldn't see the forest for the trees - they were "too close to see".
//
//
The new direction of Jesus' life and ministry was not going to be held back by those who wanted to hold on to his past.
Like young Jeremiah, Jesus knew that God does not hold us back.  Yes, we are known for who we were, but that does not limit who we can become.
//
//
I think a message for us today (from what we have read in Jeremiah and Luke) is that we are encouraged to not be so quick to think we know everything about our current situation.
//
Our accumulated knowledge and understandings not withstanding, there is more to discover - more to learn.  We are continuously maturing as individuals in this life and in our relationship with God.
Our call to be people of faith is constantly evolving. 
Each day, there are new opportunities to become the people our God would have us be.
//
That will, no doubt, bring us times of (both) comfort and challenge.  Like it was for Jesus, for us, faithful living involves being on the edge.
There is great value for us to remain mindful of the wider perspective - the bigger picture of God's compassion for us and all creation.
//
Let us desire to know more.
Let us view mystery not as something to be feared, but as a wonder be embraced.
//
When we find ourselves on those difficult ledges and edges, let us trust that God can guide us toward the new paths - away from the difficulties of the past.
Let's give each other room to grow.  And let's find ways to walk the paths of life and faith together.
We are not alone.
Thanks be to God.
//
Let us pray:
God, we find you with ones we did not expect. You do what we would not have chosen. Move our lives to join you on the edge, where holy love stretches out with grace.
Amen.

#161MV “I Have Called You By your Name”

Sunday, January 24, 2016

I NEED YOU

January 24, 2016
Epiphany 3
1st Corinthians 12:12-31a
Luke 4:14-21
(prayer)
Words of a 20th century Canadian poet:
Every night is a different game
We gotta work for our fortune
and fame
Success is a ladder,
take a step at a time


And the people will remember
your name

And you'll find out
every trick in the book
And that's there's only one way
to get things done
You'll find out
the only way to the top
Is looking out for number one
I mean you
keep looking out for number one
The gospel according to Randy Bachman.
//
//
There is not one of us who does not experience the lure of selfishness.  In fact, I am sure that, even the most noble among us, even the our greatest benefactors continue to be motivated - at some basic level - by a sense of self-advancement.
I think that it is part of our instinctual, primal DNA - we are here (as a species) because of our ability to selfishly adapt.
In the extreme, we can sometimes have no regard for the well-being of others… even seeing anything that threatens our status quo as an obstacle to be overcome.
And let’s be honest, on a community or society level, people have (at times) developed ideologies - even theologies - that advance and maintain an ego-centric view of the world by wielding an institutional hammer of control.
We see this - most obviously - when groups or individuals who are different are shunned or excluded… sometimes even using the tools of officialdom to advance the in-crowds selfish identity.
“Looking out for number one.”
//
//
And yet... the profoundly simple scripture readings today, invite us to think differently.
Words of a 6th century (BCE) Judean prophet:
I preach good news to the poor.
I proclaim release to the captives
and recovery of sight to the blind
and freedom to the oppressed.
The gospel according to third Isaiah.  [by "third Isaiah" I mean the author of chapters 55-66 of the book of Isaiah - for a primer on the distinct sections of that book, see my sermon notes online from last week]
When we find the place in Isaiah chapter 61, we can read that (as the returning exiles were learning how to reclaim their heritage and faith practices unique to living in Judah) a prophet spoke of a restoration of people as well.
In the struggle to rebuild, the prophet proclaimed beyond his own needs and highlighted the plight of the society's most vulnerable. 
The poor and oppressed he spoke of were not victims of Babylon or Persia; they existed in the Judean Hebrew society of the present.  They were at risk in the midst of all the efforts to rebuild and create a new prosperity.
The prophet felt called by God to remind his nation that they are challenged to be different than their captors of the last seventy years - an egalitarian reset was called for in this new time.
The last phrase of the teaching: to proclaim the year of the Lord's favourite is a reference to the instruction in the Torah for a super-sabbath (of sorts).
The law expected a day of rest at the end of every week.
Land was to be rested (laid fallow) every seven years.
And after a sabbath length of sabbath years (7×7 years), everyone was to be given a fresh start in year 50: a jubilee.  Prisoners and slaves set free, debts forgiven, lands redistributed.
//
//
Six centuries later, these old wise words were read with a fresh proclamation.
The people of Nazareth listened as the carpenter's son took his turn as the reader for the day.  He found the place near the end of the scroll of Isaiah and read words from a time gone by.
There was a pause as the people thought about the prescribed scripture reading for the day. 
And then... the voice they had known for 30 years said something unfamiliar and unexpected:  Like in the days of Isaiah, these words ring true today.  I do not just read them as a record of our past, they are true and current:
The annointing Spirit of the Lord
is upon ME.
I preach good news to the poor.
I proclaim release to the captives
and recovery of sight to the blind
and freedom to the oppressed.
The time of jubilee is now!
The gospel according to Jesus.
//
//
The diverse group of believers gathered around to listen to someone read the letter they had just received.  They had asked so many questions in the letter they had written.  Now they had Paul's answers - the debates about leadership finally could be settled.  What does God want? 
A few of them waited eagerly for their question to come up.  Finally, on one of the last pages, they had their answer to the question - "Who does the Risen Christ need most of all: Prophets? Teachers? Healers? Spiritual Interpretations?  Who?  Who is number one?"
They listened as the letter was read outloud:
Now concerning spiritual gifts.
There is not one gift, but many.
And yet...
they all come from the same place: the Spirit of the Lord, your God.
Together, they serve
a common good.
It's like how a body is made up of many different parts,
but work together in one body.
What good would it be to have a body made up of only hands;
how would you see?
The body needs variety.
And so do you!
Yes, some parts might seem especially and obviously valuable,
but do not lose sight of
those most vulnerable parts
whose honour and respect
might be overlooked.
Remember: not 'one of you'
(no matter how gifted)
can be the church
all on your own. 
The greatest gift is known
in the combining of your gifts.
Strive for that!
The gospel according to Paul.
//
//
//
I am sure that we all believe in the reality of our interconnectedness. 
No matter how independently minded we might be, we do not subsist solely on our own merits.
No matter how much we subscribe to doctrines of personal responsibility and natural consequences of the choices we make, we do not have control of every factor that dictates the quality of our lives.
//
Our modern (so called) 'western' culture does not fall neatly into any extreme.  We are neither a pure laissez-faire nor a socialist model.  We have evolved a society that seeks to respect, but not abandon, the individual.  The structure has varied over the eons and distances, but, this (I would argue) has basically true for most of human history - with varying levels of success.
Even as we might look out for number one, few of us want to ignore the needs and hopes of our fellow travelers on this road.
//
I saw a Facebook meme the other day that pointed out that a bucket of KFC chicken was worth more than a barrel of light Texas crude oil.
Ignoring the ironic truth of one of the posted comments that 'neither is supposed to be good for us', there is a further truth to worry and struggle that many in our immediate local community are experiencing today.
How can we meet our basic needs, when the means, by which we have grown used to meeting those needs, are changing.
It doesn't seem to matter how many times, Alberta has experienced the cycle of boom and bust, we find ourselves ill-prepared when the crash becomes real.
It is a larger version of the reality of trying to drive during the first snowfall of winter.
Our forward thinking prophets have preached the value of diversity (diversification) of our economy for decades, but we could not embrace that bigger need because of the alluring immediate boom-era benefits to number one.
But - as seems to always happen - we can't ignore it now, because our collective vulnerability has been exposed.
//
//
If we stop the conversation here, all we've done is proclaim "I told you so!" and that is not what our prophets in today's scriptures modeled for us.
Isaiah proclaimed good news for us and those among us who are vulnerable - through a rethinking of priorities.
Jesus wanted his lifelong neighbours to not simply reflect on the words of Isaiah as a message for long gone returning exiles, but for today!
This scripture has been fulfilled.
Jesus said.
//
//
In today's economy, more are vulnerable.  I see it more and more.  Every week, I hear new stories of struggle and worry.
Much of the worry comes from the fact that we have virtually no control over the source of the economic downturn.  Worldwide demand for oil is down; capacity and supply is high.  The laws of supply and demand translates that into a low value for oil.
But... people are not oil.
We are not of low value.
There is little any of us can do to control the economy, and so our focus can and should be on what we can control:
·         our actions,
·         our thoughts,
·         the importance we place on ourselves, and others.
It may feel like a time of scarcity.  And in such times, the temptation can be to become more narrowly focused on ourselves.
And yet... our scriptures encourages the opposite.
Paul refused to endorse one style of leadership and involvement over another, instead choosing to highlight our interconnectedness.
The message is... I need more than just myself.  I need you.  You need me.
When we are able to proclaim this with real openness and honesty, true community can emerge.
//
//
It is very hard to know to what extent the ancient hebrews practices a full jubilee, but those times of adjustment must have been hard for some of the people... change is hard to endure, regardless of whatever future is promised or hoped for.
//
//
The gospel endures.
The good news remains.
//
We are part of something more than ourselves.  We are not alone.
We have God as our comfort and guide.  We will get through all times of challenge and hope... together.
//
Let us pray:
We long for good news, O God.  Good for ourselves, our community our world.  May we listen for your goods news and how we can be a part of it.  Amen.


#381VU “Spirit of Life”

Sunday, January 17, 2016

DOING WHAT IS RITE

January 17, 2016
Epiphany 2
Isaiah 62:1-5
John 2:1-11
(prayer)
The biblical book of Isaiah is one of three books in the Hebrew Bible that are described as writings of major prophets.  The other two are Jeremiah and Ezekiel.  The twelve other prophetic books (like Micah, Amos, Hezekiah, Nahum, Habakkuk, etc.) are referred to as minor prophets.
The major-minor monikers are quantitative not qualitative.  Jeremiah, Isaiah and Ezekiel are called major simply because they are longer.  The minor prophetic books were each much shorter.  In fact, all of minor prophets would have fit on to one scroll in the synagogues - the major prophets required their own scrolls.
//
The book of Isaiah has been divided into sixty-six chapters: compare that to Joel which has only three.  66 chapters is second only to the book of Psalms - the longest book in the Old Testament - both  in chapters and word count (there are 150 psalms).
However, when we look closely at Isaiah, we discover that it is more than it appears.  Biblical scholars almost universally agree that there are three distinct sections of the book that were written at different times in Israel's history:
·         Chapters 1-39 may well be the work of the prophet named Isaiah mentioned in first verses of the book - who prophesied during the reigns of the Judea kings, Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah.  That dates these first 39 chapters to the mid-eighth century before Jesus.
·         Chapters 40-55 and 56-66 clearly come from about a century later.  Unless he lived to an unnaturally long age, it is unlikely that these second and third parts share the same author as part one.  Even so, the later authors seemed to have intentionally built on the original author's style and themes, so the complete scroll has a cohesiveness and poetry that makes it one of the most significant books of the bible.
//
If you happened to be here at St. David's last week (or caught my sermon notes online), you may recall that we read from Isaiah chapter 43.
I had mentioned then that the middle part of Isaiah (chapters 40-55) comes from the time when the people of Judah lived as exiles in Babylon (597-539 BCE).  Last week, we heard words of hope and promise that the people would be restored - that sons and daughters would be called back to Judah.
//
Today, we read from chapter 62, from the third distinct section of Isaiah.  This part appears to have been written after the people had returned home and were in the midst of rebuilding and restoring their nation.
//
The hard work of returning from two generations of exile had been completed, but the prophet does not describe a god who is willing to rest on these laurels.  I will not keep silent.  I will not rest, says God.  It is not enough to simply have returned: the people must know joy and prosperity again. There is more to do to be fully restored.
//
For me, this speaks to the practice of faithful living.  That our standing as a people of god is not simply an historical account, but it is to be a present reality.
And so, the returning exiles - who had held on to the basics of their faithfulness while in exile - reclaimed anew some of their practices of faith - they built a new Temple in Jerusalem.  They studied again the levitical rituals and they learned again how to be the people of Judah… in Judah.
//
//
It is still a valuable challenge for today - to try and continually live out our faith... in ways that enrich and enliven our spirits and in ways that promote God’s compassion and justice to the world.
//
//
The gospel of John is quite unique when compared to the three other biblical gospels.
Matthew, Mark and Luke share so many similar passages (even word-for-word identical sections in some cases) that make it clear that they must share some common source material.  [Google "TwoSource Hypothesis" to learn more] This is why bibical scholars refer to Matthew, Mark and Luke as the synoptic gospels.  They share a common point of view.
But the author of John seems to have made the conscious choice to present the narratives of Jesus’ life and ministry in a different way.  Scholars believe that John was written a couple of decades later than the other gospels.  It is reasonable to assume that John's author was aware of at least some of the other gospel narratives.
There are a few passages in John that have parallels in the synoptics, but the fourth gospel is far less concerned with the timing of events and who was involved than what these times meant to the followers of Jesus that made up the early church of the late first century.
Here's an example.  All four gospels share some version of a story where Jesus causes a violent scene at the temple: turning over tables, disrupting commerce. 
“My temple should be a house of prayer, but you have made it a den of thieves”
The three synoptic gospels place this story near the end of Jesus' life, during his last week, only days before his arrest and execution.  But, in John, the story is told as one of the first events of Jesus' active ministry.
Biblical literalists must insist that Jesus must have cleansed the temple twice. 
More likely, the writer of John simply moved the timing to make a greater point about Jesus - perhaps that his whole ministry would challenge long held assumptions about how things were.
//
While it may appear that the gospels are historical books, it is fair to say that none of the gospel writers were sharing objective accounts of history. They were not reporters, they were evangelists.  They all were primarily concerned about sharing meaning and impact for the early church:  what do the events and teachings of Jesus’ life mean for the followers of Jesus decades later?
Compared to the synoptic gospels, John does this to the n-th degree!
//
And so, when we read from the biblical gospels, we can hear the words in their literal context - but (I am quite certain) that the gospel writers also wanted us to reflect on the more-than-literal lessons in the stories.
//
As is not unusual about the events described in the fourth gospel, John’s work is the only one that shares the story of the Wedding at Cana.  We don’t find it anywhere else in the other gospels.
//
Literal Context.
Jesus and some of his family and followers are all attending a wedding in a town identified as Cana.  Modern archeologists and biblical scholars are not sure exactly where ancient Cana was (there are about five possible modern sites that are usually mentioned), but it appears to have been a Galilean town, likely less than a day’s walk from Nazareth.
According to John, chapter twenty one, verse two, one of Jesus’ disciples was from “Cana in Galilee”.
The literal context of this story in John 2 is that (at this wedding) the guests were enjoying themselves - perhaps a little more than the wedding planners had anticipated - as the bar was becoming depleted.
For reasons not mentioned in the text, Jesus’ mother was very bothered by the limited wine stores.  Mary complains to Jesus: “They have no wine!”  Jesus’ response sounds a bit disrespectful for a mother-son dialogue: “Woman, why should you care?  Why should I care?”
[I do love to speculate about why Mary is so concerned.  I can think of three fairly logical reasons:
1.    She’s a busy-body - complaining about stuff that really isn’t her business.
2.    She really wanted to drink more wine!
3.    She had some role in the planning or running of this wedding.  Maybe it was a family wedding.  If you are a DaVinci Code fan, maybe it was Jesus' wedding to Mary Magdalene (when I think about it: the only wedding in my life where both my mom and lots of my friends were there was my own.)  Just as likely, it was a typical small town wedding and everyone was invited.
As I said, it may be fun to speculate, but the text of John doesn’t tell us why Mary cared so much about the wine.]
The literal context then has Jesus taking action to eleviate his mother's concern.  Mary tells the wedding servers (still acting like it was her job to worry about the food and drink) to do whatever Jesus says.
The miracle: Jesus somehow changes water into wine.  Six huge barrels (normally used for ritualistic washing) are filled with water, but turn out to be filled with wine when the stewards take a closer look.  And more so, it is a high quality wine.
In the story, we get to overhear the wine steward compliment (or criticize) the groom for serving such a good quality vintage late in the evening when he could have gotten away with a lesser wine and the guests probably wouldn't have noticed.
The author of John makes the point that only the servants who filled the jugs knew it was a miracle, but also finishes the story by saying that this was a 'sign' of Jesus' glory that caused the disciples to believe in him.
That is the literal story.  Jesus orders that water be poured into big jars, but when it was tasted, it is clear that it has become high quality wine.  And... people believe Jesus to be glorious special because of this.
The literal story is a good story.
It is a fun story.
It makes the case for Jesus to be rightfully called a miracle worker: one who performed signs and wonders.
//
But there is so much more in John 2:1-11.
There is a wonderful depth of meaning to discover beyond the literal
I don't know where to start.
//
//
There is ritual and ceremony both explicit and implied in the story.  First, everyone is in Cana for a wedding.  Weddings are ceremonies (celebrations) of relationship.  They are a "rite of passage" - wherein people move to a new stage in their lives.  Children leave their parents and are joined to their spouses.  Weddings are a statement of a hopeful future.  The society will endure through a new generation.
Religiously, marriage is viewed as part of the intentions of God.  In Matthew's gospel Jesus is quoted as saying: what therefore God has joined together, let no one separate.
//
As I mentioned earlier, John doesn't present the life of Jesus the same way the synoptic gospels do. 
From the synoptic gospels and the new testament letters, we are fairly sure that there were two specific rituals that were part of the life of the early churches that emulate events in Jesus' life.  In most modern churches, these rituals are set aside as particularly holy events: sacraments.
Baptism.
Communion.
So, it seems odd that John's gospel ignores the significant events of Jesus being baptized (which precedes the call to go out into the world and invite others to be baptized in Jesus' name) and his sharing of a last supper with his disciples (which precedes to repeat this action in remembrance of Jesus).
The fourth gospel does talk about John the Baptist identifying Jesus as the lamb of god, but there is no mention of Jesus being baptized.
The text also has Jesus and his disciples together the evening of his arrest.  Jesus has a lot to say, but he doesn't talk about the meal in John's gospel.
On the surface, it appears that John's gospel does not mention baptism or communion.
But... look at today's story.
The intended use of the jars (that contained the miraculous wine) was to hold water for "rites of purification".  Within the Hebrew society before, during and after Jesus' lifetime, there were several instances when the Torah required ritualistic washing to provide a person with the ceremonial cleanliness to fully participate in the religious life of the community.
The practice of Christian baptism has its origins in these rituals (that were part of the known culture of Jesus and his first disciples).
It is quite possible, that (by including the detail about the designed purpose of the jars used for Jesus' miracle) the author of John is making a subtle reference to the early church practice of baptism.
The first readers of John in the late first century may have found the hidden message that (in Jesus) the rites of purification have been re-purposed for the members of the early church.
So, in a small way, the miracle of new wine at the wedding at Cana is also a baptism story.
//
If that seems to be a bit of a stretch for you, the connection of the Cana story to communion should be more obvious.
There is a new promise in this wine.  Each time you drink it, remember me.
I am quite certain that the readers of John would be reminded of their own practices of communion as they heard about Jesus providing the best possible wine.
//
[Aside:  In spite of not directly telling baptism and communion stories, John's gospel does contain memorable phrases like: Ask me for living water - everyone who drinks it will never be thirsty - the water I give will become a spring gushing up to eternal life; I Am the bread of life; Jesus poured water into a basin and began to wash his disciples feast; I Am the true vine.]
//
//
In a way, the story of the Cana wedding wine is all about rituals of faithful living: reminding us of the blessings of the time we are in and point us to a hopeful future of fulfilled promises.
By engaging in spiritual practices and being mindful of their meaning and impact, we are doing the work of deepening our faith and strengthening our relationship with God.
//
Faith enrichment and faith development can be so much more than a passive activity.  The prophet Micah warned against a passive, meaningless faith life, when he rhetorically asked:
With what shall I come before the Lord and bow down before the exalted God?  Shall I come before him with burnt offerings, with calves a year old? ... And what does the Lord require of you?
 -to act justly and
 -to love mercy and
 -to walk humbly with your God.
//
I hope that we-all can take on the challenge of the surprising meaning that we find just below the surface of today's scripture passages.
//
The moment we are in (no matter how wonderful or worrying) is not our final resting place - the work of new construction is still before us; our faith (no matter how deep) can be deepened; our lives (no matter how settled) can still surprise us.
//
Faithful living (literally) invites a faith that is lived out.  Lived out - physically, mentally and spiritually: body, mind and soul.
I am so proud to be a part of a congregation where I see people gladly living out a faith that seeks to change the world: from our regular support of the food co-op and the food bank, we are making a difference; we are at the early stages of working to make the world a bit smaller and more inviting by helping resettle a displaced family seeking (not only refuge but) a promising future.
You (as a people of God) care about places like the Ramana’s Garden Orphanage in India, even as you engage in your own Bible Study and make plans for a Men's Conference in the fall of 2017 and provide programs for children and youth to learn and practice faith.
You support each other through rides to church and shared pots of tea.  You gather together toddlers, and children and adults to come together in a shared love of music and singing.
And much more... that is emerging all the time.
//
The returning exiles knew it, as did the disciples of Jesus: God is not silent, God does not rest
God is a present reality to be known and experienced.
And in that experience, we become more than we are.
// end //
Feast on that for a while.
//
Thanks be to God.
//
Let us pray:
God of the feast, open us up to trust in compassion that never runs out.  Amen.


#471VU “Eat This Bread and Never Hunger”