Sunday, October 23, 2016

THREE PRAYERS

October 23, 2016
Pentecost 23
(silent prayer - unannounced)
“dictionary.com” defines prayer as a spiritual communion with an object of worship [i.e. God].
I quite like that: Spiritual Communion - a coming together of spirits between us and the One whom we worship.
//
In a parable story, Jesus presented contrasting prayers. 
First a pharisee.
By all accounts, Jesus, himself was a pharisic jew.  He worshiped in synagogues, he believed in an active spiritual realm, he championed social justice, he found inspiration and authority in not only the books of the Torah, but also in the prophets and other writings in scripture.  Like other pharisees, Jesus believed that there was a resurrection  hope for the dead.  Jesus respected the pharisaic way of faithful living. 
Jesus' audience would naturally assume that the pharisee in the parable would be a person worthy of admiration.
 In the story Jesus told, a pharisee stands out in the open and prays loudly (for everyone to hear): bragging to God that he is deeply devout - O Lord, I follow faithful religious practices: fasting twice per week, giving a tenth of my income.  Aren't I great, God - better than others.  I thank you, God, that I am not a thief, an adulterer, a rogue, nor (point) a tax-collector.  Even though this pharisee is in prayer, his focus seems to be on his surrounding; he is looking around, pointing out to God (in the middle of his prayer) that there is a less devout tax-collector in the Temple at the same time.
I'm the best pharisee. 
Nobody prays as well as I do.
//
Jesus is clearly implying that this pharisee is doing more than personally communing spiritually with God; the pharisee clearly wants others in the Temple to hear his words.  He wants others to contrast his life and faith with that of the tax-collector.  The pharisee fully expects to win this little piety contest.
//
Now, just as they would have a natural positive reaction to a pharisee, the audience listening to Jesus would have had an instant negative reaction to the character of the tax-collector.
//
During the first century, Judea was an nation occupied by the Roman Empire that was at the height of its reach and influence. 
Rome's expansionism was a means of expanding its tax base.  People in the lands it controlled were expected to pay taxes to Caesar.  Provincial governers along with puppet regional leaders set up systems to ensure that the Empire got what it wanted.  Practically, complicit locals were recruited by the Empire to collect these taxes. 
To their compatriots, these tax collectors were viewed as traitors to their own people. 
Tax collectors were given a quota to collect for their region - their personal income was derived from collecting amounts above and beyond what had to be turned over to the Romans.  So, you can imagine that an unscrupulous or intimidating person could do very well for themselves as a tax collector for Rome.
Jesus expected the audience to start with the assumption that the tax collector was a sinner and that the pharisee was the model for an upstanding righteous person.
Then we heard the pharisee's self-indulgent public prayer and contrast it with the other one.  The tax collector's prayer was deeply personal and heart-felt.  With his head down and pounding his chest, away from others, he admitted his own shortcomings and laid out his soul to the mercy of God.  If he was speaking loud enough for others to hear, that was not his intent - even in a crowded courtyard, he felt as if he was alone in his spiritual communion with his God.
//
//
In the reading from Second Timothy, we have a third prayer (of sorts) from scripture this morning.
We heard some of the Apostle Paul's reflections as he knew that he would likely die in captivity.
Although, in the letter, the words are presented as a soulful sharing with his friends, we can imagine that Paul could have expressed these same sentiments to his God.
Lord, you have stood by me, even as others gave up on me.  Forgive them God.  Lord, you gave me strength enough (even as a prisoner) to share the message of Jesus with the gentiles.  As I finish life's race, I am ready to receive the rescue of your heavenly kingdom.
//
//
Three prayers.
·         One showy and self-engrandizing.
·         One humble and vulnerable.
·         One accepting and appreciative.
These types of prayers are not stuck in time - each are still prayed by certain people in certain circumstances, today.  We pray for ourselves, we pray out of our vulnerability and we pray in gratitude.
//
//
Prayer: a spiritual communion with God.
//
//
Formal public prayer - during worship gatherings - is one of our traditions.
tradition = faithful habit
When we come together here on Sunday mornings, we regularly include several times of prayer in the worship service:
We open with prayer. 
I offer a prayer just before I preach. 
We pray over our offerings and over water for baptisms and the bread and juice for communion.
We offer prayers of Dedication a day blessing for prayer shawls, stained glass windows and other significant artefacts of our ministry.
In virtually every worship service, we prayer some version of the Lord’s Prayer. 
And near the end of our time together, we take time to share prayers of thanksgiving and intercession. 
Sometimes, we prayer together (pre-written words on the screen).
Sometimes one person (me) offers prayers on behalf of all of us - including prayers others have written down.
Sometimes we pray in silence.
Sometimes we pray in song.
Sometimes, we light candles as signs of prayer.
//
And I know that many St. David's people include a practice of prayer in their lives beyond our congregating together in this place.
//
//
And we are wisely humble enough to know that prayer isn't limited to houses of worship or even the hearts and minds of the regular church-goers.
Afterall, being religious and being spiritual and having faith are not necessarily the same things.
For example, when something horrible happens - locally or on any arc of this world (natural disasters, serious accidents, acts of terror, the horrors of war, etc.) - calls go out for ‘thoughts and prayers’ - often far beyond those who have an active faith lives.  On social media, ‘prayer memes’ go viral far beyond churchfolk; even profile pictures can be temporarily changed as actions of digital prayer in response to tragedy.
//
Prayer is a word that flows easily off the tongue.  But... how often do we think about the nature of prayer: 
Why do we pray?
What are we doing when we pray? 
What impact do we intend or hope it to have? 
How does it affect us?
How does it affect the Holy Mystery we call God?
//
//
dictionary.com's definition of prayer as spiritual communion is further described with words like
1.      supplication,
2.      thanksgiving,
3.      adoration and
4.      confession.
These are four common types of prayer that are part of our tradition: supplication, thanksgiving, adoration, confession.
The last three are focused on the mindset of the pray-er and might be described as a 'reporting to God':  Thanksgiving; Confession; Adoration.
In prayer, I express gratitude or I admit my shortcomings (my words, actions and inactions that are inconsistent with what I see as the will of God) or, I simply tell God that I am in awe of my creator: I offer praise, express adoration/love for my God.
Prayer (in these ways) are an spiritual communion based on our inner, self-reflection.
But when people think about prayer, I suspect that supplications are what usually come to mind: prayer as a devout petition to God.
This type of prayer is more than a report to God.  Supplications (or intercessions) are requests for God to take some action on behalf of someone - to intercede in the otherwise natural course the world.  God, please do this; guide me; help me; heal my friend; stop this war; change the weather; let my team win; get me this job; change me or another person for the better; punish someone; win me this prize; give me peace...
//
How we understand supplicative prayer is directly related to our beliefs about the nature of God.
//
Before, I get into this, I have to say, that I (like most of you, I suspect) have no certainty about how God operates. 
I am informed by not only the traditions of the church and centuries of faithful study and thought, but also my own experience as a person practising faith and as a person in touch with a need to balance knowledge and mystery.
My training and designation as a minister does not (unfortunately) give me any secret insights that are not available to any of you.
Like many modern seekers of faith, I need what I believe about God to make sense within my understanding of how the universe works.  I am open to mystery, but I won't abandon logic and reason on my journey of faith.
//
In the United Church, when we say our New Creed, we profess that "We believe in God, who has created and is creating".  Is creating: if we believe this, we are saying that God is more than the spark of the big bang and that we are open to God as an active force in the life of the universe - not only in the past, but in the present and the future.
This view takes a whole continuum of forms among people of faith.
//
There are some who reject any notion of an interventionist God.  This is not necessary only the mantra of atheists, but is also believed by people of faith, who would profess that at most, God is the source of the stuff of the universe and the author of the laws of physics, but that once the machine of existence was set in motion, God is no longer involved in what happens.  God may have created, but is no longer creating.
With this view, perhaps God is simply waiting and watching to seek how things unfold. 
Or... this might match a theology of predestination - a belief that God included (in the first stirrings of creation) all of the things that would ever happen in every time and place.
Scripturally, we see this in passages like Psalm 139: Even before a word is on my tongue behold, O Lord, you know it altogether... Your eyes saw my unformed substance;  in your book were written, every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there was none of them. (Psalm 139:4,16)
With predestination, there is nothing that can be done to alter the primordial will of God.  Every single thing that happens is part of God's original plan.
//
//
The opposite view to this is... to ascribe to God the ability to evolve new divine thoughts and have an openness to recreating as God's interaction with the universe is lived out.
//
There are those believe that the nature of God is like someone playing with Legos - holy hands in constant creative mode: adjusting, taking apart, reassembling, adding new pieces, etc.  This nature of God is one of being the Universe's micro-manager.
The stuff that the micro-manager God plays with is physical and meta-physical; tactile and emotional.  The world we live in, our deepest thoughts, feelings and actions are under the ultimate control of God.  There is no detail so small that it is beyond God's influence.
If this is the nature of God, one view of prayer is for us to seek to influence God to arrange the Lego of the universe in ways that we want.
I sometimes have referred to this as the vending machine god.  We simply have to push the right buttons and give up the correct amount of our resources, and God will respond with the treat we want.
We see this in scriptures like Luke 11:9 - Ask and you shall receive. Or Jeremiah 18 or Isaiah 64's metaphor of god as an artisan potter.
A truly faithful person can enjoy extraordinary blessings.  God is pretty much obligated to reward the pious for their piety.
//
That is an extreme view.  I have to admit that I have not met many people (who claim a God) who claim to have the ability to control God.  I feel comfortable saying that almost no one believes that God has no say in the matter.  The belief goes... that the sovereignty of God is such that, even if we do everything right, God may not respond as we want.  Sometimes, God's answer to prayer is no.
Although, if we don't get the answer we want, we will probably hear things like "we must not have prayed hard enough, or been faithful enough" or "God had other plans" or "the Lord works in mysterious ways".  And we might want to cry out to God: "Why!?!"  
//
The existence of seemingly senseless tragedy and suffering in the world is one of the arguments against the existence of a god - a benevolent, interventionist god, at least.
//
//
Another perspective is to view God as less of a micro-manager and more of a mentor.  In this view, God may be more intimately involved in the big picture of our lives rather than tinkering with the details. 
As a holy mentor, God is a companion on the journey of our lives - offering support, advice, but not so concerned with controlling us.
The opposite of a theology of predestination is a theology of free will
Deuteronomy chapter 30, from the end of the Exodus in the time of Moses, has God saying: See, I have set before you today life and prosperity, death and adversity ... Choose life so that you and your descendants may live. (Dt30:15,19b)
//
One of my earthly mentors, Gareth Higgins, has taught me that with free will 'people make choices' and 'evil exists' in the world, not because God predestined it but because 'sometimes [the] choices [we make] have shadows'.
Higgins says that God's universe makes sense with free will because it is 'better that dictatorship and tyranny; it's better than making us into robots'.
//
My kids like to play video games.  Part of the fun of a game is not knowing what is coming next.  Well-crafted games allow for multiple choices and multiple possibilities that flow from those choices.  Even the most avid gamer would be hard-pressed to fully understand every nuanced aspect of the game.  Perhaps only, the original programmer would be aware of the totality of the gaming environment, but if the game is complex enough, even the programmer could be surprised by combination of choices and consequences an individual gamer might make on a given day.
//
In my mind, it makes sense that for God to have an honest relationship with creation, God needs to allow creation to unfold beyond God's willingness to control every detail.  Free will allows God to truly commune with the creatures of the creation in ways whose possibilities are endless.
//
In this way, God is not so much the designer of a single path for our lives, but a companion along a journey unfolding before us that is determined by some conscious choices on our part and other factors beyond our control.
And so, prayer within this nature of God, is to seek assurance that we are not alone.  We pray for companionship and compassion in whatever circumstance we end up in.
As with a mentor, we might seek advice, we might receive some insight, but the mentor does not force us to act in a particular way - the impact of what will happen has more to do with us and the choices we make than the mentor.
The spiritual communion with a free will god, is not so much asking Our Maker to change our situation, but to support us as we live with the effects of our choices and circumstances.  The comfort of discovering that we are not alone or abandoned, but held and loved, becomes a factor in our next choice.
CS Lewis famously said, "I pray because the need flows out of me all the time - waking and sleeping.  It doesn't change God - it changes me."
//
//
//
That is my food for thought for today.  Three possible natures of God that can effect what a person  hopes to get out of prayer - a spiritual communion with God.:
1     The creator who, now that the universe is spinning, just watches the plan unfold.  To this god, the purpose of prayer is primarily gratitude and awe.
2     The creator who isn't finished yet, still changing the plan as time unfolds.  Praying to this god, seeks to influence the next combination of Lego blocks in God's playroom.
3     And, a god who is along side us as we live and move and have our being.  Communing in prayer with this god is to know holy presence, to be assured that God is known through hearts filled with love and peace.  Given that, we pray to seek support and comfort in good times and bad.
I'm sure that God and Prayer are not so neatly defined to fit into any one of these three exclusively.
//
Prayer - like God - is mysterious.
//
And yet, without certainty, we still desire to have an on-going relationship with this mystery.
//
We long to join our spirit with the Spirit of God.
//
//
Trusting that there is something meaningful in the mystery, let us pray:
Holy Mystery, guide us and comfort us.  Raise us up when we are low and gently bring us down when we are out of touch.  Amen.

#497VU “Nearer My God to Thee”


Sunday, October 16, 2016

JUSTICE

October 16, 2016
Pentecost 22
(prayer)
My favorite scene from the 1977 body building documentary "Pumping Iron" is where Arnold Schwarzenegger trys to (passive aggressively) intimidate Lou Ferrigno.
Watch how Arnold exploits that Lou is not feeling well and saying how Ferrigno looks like he needed another month to prepare.

//
//
I have been a sports fan my whole life: of varying degrees of fanaticism  As a kid, I played hockey and soccer.  I have been the dad of a daughter and sons who have played competitive sports.  And I've been a coach. 
Most sports, even children's sports, include: (some level of) the intimidation of opponents.
*Trying to impress during warm ups. 
*Team cheers: sounding confident.
*Standing tall: looking confident. 
*Even a bit of trash taking.
I've even witnessed fellow coaches trying to get in a referee's head with certain borderline complaints - not expecting to win that argument, but maybe laying ground to get a favorable call later in the game; I never felt comfortable going that far, myself.
**example**
//
You can also think about the staredowns between boxers at the weigh in or in the ring during the referee's instructions.
//
Intimidation is just part of the sports game.
//
But intimidation can be found off the fields and courts as well.  And in those places, it is NOT a game.
Intimidation is in schools, workplaces, the street... everywhere.
Sometimes, it's pretty minor.
Often it is an uncomfortable powergrab.
It might simply be an attempt for a person to compensate for a lack of confidence with the illusion of bravado; it could be an attempt to avoid a fight, or maybe... start a fight  (some people get off on this sort of thing); it could be a negotiating tactic; or it could be bullying or even criminal.
//
I noticed in the news this week, that a certain politician south of the boarder (not mentioning any names) has responded to multiple examples unfavorable press stories by threatening to bring lawsuits.
Threatening a lawsuit doesn't necessarily mean that legal action will ever actually be initiated, but the threat of suing is - at a minimum - meant to send a message:
"You, don't want to mess with me or it will cost you! "
This kind of intimidation can be particularly effective if there is a big difference in the power level or economic capacities of the parties.  Sometimes a person feels they can't afford to fight.
This same politician (in his business life) is said to have a reputation of regularly underpaying invoices and then challenging suppliers to just accept the newly dictated terms or take him to court.  Most couldn't afford to fight.
//
When the parties cannot compete fairly, intimidation (sadly) can be extremely effective.
//
//
//
In this morning's reading from Luke, Jesus told a parable about a person seeking justice.
Jesus sets her up to be seen as a severe underdog.  First, she is female.  Women, in Jesus' day, were not considered equal to me in the eyes of all levels of society - including in the halls of justice.  Normally, a woman wouldn't even go seek justice... the dominant male in her life (father, husband, brother) would make presentations on her behalf.
Jesus' parable tells us that she had no such male advocate - she was a widow.
This could be the reason that the judge had no desire to even listen to the merits of her case.  She was ignored... with the hope that she would just go away, along with her insignificant problem.
But, it was not insignificant to her.  And she was determined to not play to type nor to submit to the intimidation of the judge's power.
Jesus doesn't bother to lay out the widow's case.  He is not asking his audience to adjudicate whether she is right or not.  By doing so, we are left to assume that she has a winning situation.  The facts are not standing in the way of justice - an indifferent (or unjust) judge is.
Jesus also doesn't give us a window into the judge's motives, either. 
Is he too busy with other work?
Is he simply sexist? 
I wonder if he had a connection to her adversary.  Was the judge protecting a friend by ignoring the widow's case?
//
But she wouldn't play along.
She came before the judge everyday.  No matter how many times sge was ignored, she just wouldn't go away.  And, eventually, she got under the judge's skin.
"She just won't go away.  All right!   Against my better instincts, I will grant her justice."
This widow out-intimidated the intimidator.
//
//
Jesus' parables always tell a bigger message that the literal narrative.  With this story, Jesus wanted to encourage his followers to include persistence in their lives of faith: to continually be seeking justice and peace in their lives; to believe that God will support and uplift them in whatever circumstance they found themselves in.
This was an important message for the people around Jesus in the third decade of the first century... and it was (perhaps) even more significant for the readers of the gospel of Luke 40-plus years after Jesus would have first told this parable.
The people of Judea and Galilee were subjects of an oppressive empire.  There were divisions between different sects of first century Judaism.
As the Christian movement grew after the first Easter, non-hebrews were being increasingly included in the fold.  A split was becoming increasingly apparent between the followers of Jesus' Way and the leaders of the Jerusalem Temple.
From many directions, there was pressure on the early Christians to abandon their newly evolving faith.
//
//
This kind of religious and political and cultural pressure was not new.  The option of simply giving up has often cropped up in the biblical narrative.
We also heard today from the prophet Jeremiah.  Many of the people Judah and Jerusalem were living in exile by the Tigris and Euphrates rivers because of the imperialistic activities of the Babylonian Empire.
Two weeks ago, we read from Lamentations and heard about the struggle of the Babylonian exile.  There was deep sadness and shock that centuries of stability were broken and the great city a day Temple were left in ruins.
Last week, we heard the prophet Jeremiah encouraging the exiles to put down roots in Babylon, to build houses, plant gardens and grow their families.  They were to maintain more than their individual lives.  They were to keep their cultural and religious identity alive for generations to come - with the promise (as we read from Jeremiah three weeks ago) that one day the fields of Judah would be bought and sold by Judeans again.
Today, the theme continues.
The faithful persistence of the people would allow them to maintain their religious and cultural identity.  So strong would their faith be that no one would need to read about God.  The law of God will be part of each person -- written on the heart.
//
//
//
Canada and many other countries have declared that - within our society - there is to be a freedom of religious practices and expression.  There is no official religion or church in Canada.  It is simply wrong to call Canada a "Christian Nation".  Adhering to any faith is not a prerequisite to visiting or living in Canada.  It is not a test for citizenship.  You are free to believe or not believe as you see fit.
It may have been more common years ago, but it can still be true that, in certain communities, or within some families, there may be imposed expectations for what a person to believe and how to practice.  But, legally, there is no right for force your beliefs or practices on anyone else.
Having said that, no right is absolute.  Like all of the precepts within the Canadian Bill of Rights, there are times that rights can conflict with each other - when that happens the courts are asked to determine where the edges of particular rights are.
The fact is that, as long as your practice is not abusive or criminal, the freedom of religion is pretty broad.  Religious bodies even have some liberty to practice discrimination around membership and proclamations under the rubric of religious freedom.
People of faith, agnostics and atheists are free to express their beliefs.
//
Just because a person is free to believe as they see fit, it doesn’t mean there is no pressure on the faithful.
//
Things have changed a lot over the last several decades when it comes to the place and prominence of the church society.  There was a time when you would have stood out if you didn't go to church.  Ironically, now you stand out if you do. 
As people of faith, we might have to embarassingly justify 'why' we might be interested in church at all.
"Church" has a number of reputations that we have earned over our 2000 years of existence.  One of which is that we are stuck in time... overly traditional, out of touch... especially given the scientific advancements of the last 100-plus years.
Last evening, a number of us watched the movie Spotlight about a team of investigative journalists writing articles about systematic child abuse in Boston churches that had been going on for decades but had managed to be swept under the rug by confidential out of court settlements and the resettlement of abusive priests.
When the team started working on the story (before they had any idea how big the conspiracy was), it was noted to the editor that they would need to be ready for resistance: from both the church hierarchy and the public.  The church does not address change easily - 'the church moves in centuries', the editor was told.
//
Ten years ago, the United Church of Canada engaged in a program (called emerging Spirit) - it addressed a modern approach to be welcoming in the church. 
To begin with it was important to accept some realities of the context we live in.
To truly embrace the essense of religious freedom, gone are the days of all non-church activities being postponed everything being closed on Sundays.  People are not given time (officially by society) to attend church.  Church is a choice in the truest sense of the word.
I know some people lament this change.  I embrace it.  Living out one's faith should require choice and effort.
//
Another modern reality of the church's centuries old reputation is that (for people with a new interest in coming to church) church can be intimidating.  Do you have to behave a certain way, look a certain way, sign on to a series of hard beliefs? Understandably, people can be shy about how they will be viewed as a newcomer.  Will they be seen as "less" by the regulars?
//
And so, as church, we start at a disadvantage... we have a reputation to either live up to or refute.
For the church of Jesus' followers to have any relevance in the world of 2016, we must seek to embody what is truly important to who we want to be.
//
And so, the question becomes... who do we (as church) want to be?  Who can we be?  Who should we be?
To borrow a phrase from Jeremiah: What will be written on our hearts?
//
//
Jesus was once asked a question about priorities.  What is the most important commandment in the law?
He picked two.
Dt6: Love God with all your heart, soul and strength.  and
Lv19: Love your neighbour as yourself.
All of the law is summed up in these two, Jesus said.
//
To love is more than blind adoration.  It involves a desire to know and understand.  To accept imperfection and disappointment and yet be open to deeper commitment.  To love is to be open to change for the sake of richer connections.
To love is to accept that someone else might look beyond our biggest faults and find our most secret graces.
To love is to be an explorer.
//
Can we set aside the reputation of intimidation and expectation and simply set out on a expedition of sacred discovery?
//
Write that on our hearts.
//
Be open to discovering God in our midst... and not be bogged down by what others say.
Be open to seeing strangers as neighbour... and allowing ourselves the privilege of being the neighbour to others.
//
As our hymn said earlier:  we are varied members of a choir... who all have a place.  God invites us to find harmony singing the song of life.
//
//
Let us live out (to the best of our abilities and desires), the faith we have today.
Let us find and know and share peace, hope, joy and love.
As we do that, justice will reign.
//
//
Let us pray:
God of Justice, strengthen our hope for a better world.  May our experience with you inspire our actions for justice.  Amen.


#701VU “What Does the Lord Require”