August 30, 2015
Pentecost 13
Ephesians 6:10-20
John 6:63-69
(prayer)
My New Testament Professor
at theological college had a tradition of telling a Friday Joke.
One week, he claimed that
through his habit of telling parables, Jesus, like Obi Wan Kenobi (of Star Wars
fame), espoused a Jedi Theology: Metaphors be with you!
//
Jesus made his teaching
points by telling memorable stories that emphasized the lesson.
We use the word ‘parable’
when talking about Jesus’ teaching stories.
Parable, as a word, has greek roots meaning ‘comparison’. It does not need to be limited to Jesus, but
that is where we hear it most often.
When we read in the gospels
that “Jesus told the crowd a parable...”, we can understand that to mean Jesus
used a metaphorical story to speak of a wider truth.
I think, we can get
ourselves into an unnecessary mess, when we only look at the surface of what is
said and not try to understand Jesus underlying point.
In fact, that is good
advice, not only for Bible Study in general - but for healthy communications in
our lives today.
I mean, how many times have
you heard (or said) but that’s not what I
meant when you’re talking with someone.
What we mean is infinitely
more crucial than what me might say.
//
And, as people, we
generally have greater respect for people whose words match the meanings. We might even stoop to calling someone a
hypocrite who says one thing and means another.
[Don’t get me going on the
Mike Duffy trial.]
//
//
One of the challenges we
have as we read the Bible and try to understand its impact for us today is that
we are removed from its original context and time. Not only are we a couple thousand of years
away from new testament times... we (well most of us, I assume) speak different
languages that new testament greek, we live in a very different culture, and we
might have a world view quite foreign to that of our first century
storytellers.
Sometimes, the old
metaphors do not apply to us as easily as they might have to their original
audience.
And so we dig deeper and
try to understand what teaching point the author wanted that original audience
to get out of the parable or story.
//
//
Both of our scripture
passages this morning (from Ephesians and from John) were written to the early
Christians in the latter half of the first century. These are people who have grown to believe in
Jesus as a great teacher from several decades earlier. This same Jesus was professed to be (by his
disciples at the time) the Messiah and Son of God.
Each of our readings today
use the language of metaphor.
Ephesians mentions a
soldier’s armour. John speaks of useless
flesh.
Let’s look at John first...
the wider context of this passage is an instruction on the early Christian
practice of sharing a ritual meal as a means of communing with Christ - the
Lord’s Supper or Communion. It is ironic
that the book of John is the only one of the four gospels to NOT relay an
account of Jesus last supper, but it has some of the deepest teachings about
communion. John’s author sneaks this
theology in to teachings of Jesus in the early chapters of the gospel. John chapter six, is where we have Jesus say,
I Am the bread of life. Before that, in
chapter six, we can read the story of a miraculous feeding of a large crowd
with only a few fish and a couple loaves of bread.
John makes the point that
some of the opponents of Jesus challenged the statement that Jesus was living
bread from heaven that would curb people’s hunger - the pharisees took the
phrase literally. How can this man give
people his own flesh to eat?
Then (in the verses just
before what we read this morning) the gospel author plays with this misinterpretation
(we can hear communion language, but some of the audience were grossed out by
the literal alternative): unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and
drink his blood, you have no life in you.
It’s either a metaphor or
cannibalistic.
Without getting into high-ecclesiastical
debates about transubstantiation or consubstantiation, I will say that most
active Christians see only metaphors in the flesh and blood language of
communion. And I suspect that a lot of
you like me find it kind of a less-than-appetizing image.
But it was new image for
the church of the first century and people struggled with its meaning. So much so, that John’s gospel admits (as we
heard this morning) that some of the followers left the movement.
//
I will profess today that I
believe that the metaphor of the bread and juice of our communion services
(first Sunday’s usually) are NOT made up of literal flesh and blood - it’s not
even a representative of Jesus’ flesh and blood that just tastes like palatable
food and drink to us.
The metaphor is not that we
physically each bits of our Lord at his table, but that - in the heart and mind
- we are taught and feel that we can have what we need through a reciprocal
loving relationship with our God. Jesus feeds
our souls (so to speak).
I like to use a parallel
metaphor: In communion, we dine with our
Christ - we share a common story (meal) that feeds us all. It unites us in body and spirit.
//
The metaphors are a vehicle
for the teaching - they are not the teaching.
//
//
In the Ephesians letter, we
were told to put on the Whole Armour of God.
How many of us have ever put on armour?
Now, even for those who are members of a modern military, the armour
from the 1st century does not apply to the 21st century.
Some people find it quite
easy to speak of faith as a battle, but I also know that there are others who
are pacifists and peacekeepers who do not always relate well to military
imagery when it comes to matters of the spirit.
But that’s what Ephesians
gives us: a soldier’s belt, a protective breastplate, armoured shoes, a shield,
a helmet and a sword.
//
But it’s a metaphor, so our
task as modern interpreters of these scriptures is to find the meaning beyond
the metaphor - to take it beyond the literal.
//
The first thing I notice is
that (with the exception of the sword, the rest of the armour mentioned in
Ephesians are defensive - they are meant to protect - they are vehicles of
endurance and preservation than they are of violent outburst.
//
So... when we seek more
than the literal, we can hear Ephesians in a fresh way.
One of things in the
passage that might be easy to miss is the adjective the author uses to describe
the armour. The church is told to put on
the whole
armour of God. The different parts each
offer only partial protection - they have a value - in the sum total - that is
beyond what any part might be able to do on its own. We can imagine that it doesn’t matter how
strong the breastplate is if the blow comes to our head. So, more important that any of the individual
aspects of faith spoken of in the passage, is the value of the totality of what
is needed.
More than literal.
Literally, a belt is designed (primarily) to hold
things up. It can also be used to make
carrying things easier.
Metaphorically, this belt
in Ephesians is ‘truth’: honesty, authenticity.
One of the aspects of a faith than can endure - Ephesians is telling us
- is that we begin with being authentic, truthful and honest about what we hold
dear and what we believe. Without this -
the rest of what we seek to do and how we live might just fall around our
feet. Next week, I will focus on this
topic in a bit more detail, but suffice it to say - hypocrisy makes an enduring
faith very difficult.
Our bodies’ most vulnerable
parts are our heads and the vital organs located in the core of our body. So, literally, a wise solider utilizes a helmet and a breastplate.
Metaphorically, this
section of Ephesians is similar to the image used in 1st Corinthians
12, where the Apostle Paul speaks of the people of God as the body of
Christ. In that scripture Paul writes
that
22... the members of the body that seem to be weaker are
indispensable, 23and those members of the body that we think less honourable we clothe
with greater honour, and our less respectable members are treated with greater
respect.
Metaphorically, we might
conclude that faith involves a
protection of the vulnerable - within us and beyond us. Ephesians calls the breastplate, ‘righteousness’
and the helmet, ‘salvation’.
We can consider the shield here as well. It is the one piece of the armour that
Ephesians doesn’t ascribe a metaphoric label to: the shield is the first line of protection. It can remind us of our ‘shelter’ - that
place of retreat, where we can ‘hold fort’ so to speak.
Protecting us at our most
vulnerable is the comfort and safety of living in God’s Way - a way that Jesus
summed up by quoting two old commandments:
1.
love
God with all you heart, soul and strength; and
2.
love
your neighbour as yourself.
At the heart of our lives
of faith is an assertion that ‘we are not alone’. We are not isolated from each other and we
are not distant from the source of our existence. And the instruction is to respond to this
proximity with a deep compassion - a care and concern for the value of good and
right relations.
I think that one of the
most significant messages we can find in Ephesians six is that our spirits are
most vulnerable when we try to live in isolation - when we think that all this
life needs is for us to ‘look out for number one’. And to extend that, I would say that one of
the harshest threats to a life of comforting faith is to fall prey to
selfishness: to think we do not need or benefit from community.
//
//
The other parts of the
armour kind of go together: the shoes of ‘proclamation’; and the sword of the ‘spirit’ and the ‘word of
God’.
As we dig deeper that the
literal, we can see a metaphor of moving beyond our place of retreat.
Ephesians speaks of the
soldier’s shoes as a means of moving beyond where we are right now. The shoes allow us to be ready to proclaim
the gospel of peace. There is wonderful
irony in that phrase - the author of Ephesians speaks with military imagery
while at the same time asserting that the goal is peaceful good news.
Let’s consider the context
of the first century church. It is the
time of the Roman Empire - for the most part it was a time of peace: the pax romanus. It was peaceful because the Empire’s military
occupation of lands discouraged wide-sweeping wars - in a funny way the Roman
might ensured peace.
The peace of Jesus stands
in stark contrast to that. The pax jesus is a peace (not through might)
but through compassion: it is a peace
sought by extending the arm of welcome to the outcast and the vulnerable, even
when the societal norm might have discouraged the full inclusion of children
and women and roman collaborators (tax collectors) and all those labeled
‘sinners’ by established religion.
It is not fear and force,
but compassion and welcome that creates the peaceful table in the Way of
Jesus. To echo the old psalmist - it is
a peace expressed in a banquet table prepared in the presence of (both those we
might have labelled) friend and enemy.
//
Back to Ephesians, what we
carry with us on the peace-focused proclamation is not a sword for slicing or
killing, but a spirit founded in the Word of God - the tradition of the
faithful; the teachings and action examples of Jesus.
We move away from our
places of inner retreats out into a world that hungry for the compassion and
peace that our God has shown us in Jesus.
//
And so it makes sense, that
even as we come together in this space for times of inner retreat among others
seeking to live in God’s way, we also regular move beyond these walls and take
the inner strength and confidence that we are not alone in to the rest of our
lives.
//
And that might just be
enough. It might be all that we need to
face the challenges to authentic, faithful living.
There is a powerful thread
of thought moving through our scripture texts this morning: a call to find
value in our being part of a community; to be grounded in the love and presence
of God and to live truth-expressing lives.
We may couch these concepts
in a metaphor or two from time to time, but we seek to be faithful in real and
meaningful ways.
Thanks be to God.
//
Let us pray:
Loving
God, we have made the bold choice to live our lives as your people. We thank
you that you are with us as we equip ourselves for this life. Amen.
#578VU
“As a Fire is Meant For Burning”
No comments:
Post a Comment