Sunday, May 21, 2017

HOW DO YOU GET TO THE MacLAB CENTRE?

May 21, 2017
Pentecost 6
John 14:15-27
Acts 17:22-25
(prayer)
     Explore the known unknown.
     Universe.
     Mind.
     Travel Guides.  Map Apps.
     παράκλητος Paraclete
     helper, advocate, counsellor
     Not alone (orphaned).
     How do you get to Carnegie Hall? Practice.
     Know through ‘practice’ = discipline
     Disciples = learners
Let us pray:
(ad lib)


#112SS “One In The Spirit”

Sunday, May 14, 2017

WOULD YOU?

May 14, 2017
Easter 5
1 Peter 2:2-10
Acts 7:55-60
(prayer)
Last week (here in church at St. David's), we read about life in the earliest weeks of the early church.
Acts, chapter two, describes a community of mutual support and care... All who believed were together and had all things in common; they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. Day by day, as they spent much time together in the temple, they broke bread at home and ate their food with glad and generous hearts, praising God and having the goodwill of all the people. (Acts 2:44-47)
//
Early on, the growing community of Jesus-followers were well-regarded (had the goodwill of all the people).
//
Today, we heard about Stephen, who was one of the people who was welcomed into that early Christian community.  Stephen was one of the thousands of new followers of Jesus.  The passage today described the public stoning of Stephen... hardly an expression of goodwill.
Obviously something happened between chapters two and seven.
//
//
The early chapters of Acts make it clear that the disciples were open and public about their faith in Jesus.  In chapter three, John and Peter heal a lame man at a temple gate and preached in the courtyard about Jesus as the culmination of their historic faith.  The disciples invited people to repent and know God's forgiveness.
We get the first hint of opposition in chapter four.  Led by members of the Sadducee sect and other temple leaders, Peter and John were arrested for spreading a doctrine of resurrection (something the Sadducees did not believe).  The next morning, the two disciples faced the high priest and were asked by what power (or by what name) are you doing this?
Acts says that Peter answered with words that were similar to what we heard in the 1st Peter letter this morning... using the metaphor that Jesus was a once-rejected stone that became a valued cornerstone.
They were released, with an order from the Council to refrain from speaking and teaching in Jesus' name, even though this was something Peter and John said they couldn't and wouldn't do. 
Even though more threats, arrests and even floggings occured, more and more people came to the disciples in the Temple for healing and teaching and (as a result) the community of believers continued to grow... it is up to more than 5000 at one point.
Acts 4:42 reads: every day in the Temple and at home, they did not cease to teach and proclaim Jesus as the Messiah.
//
The group was becoming too large for the disciples to manage - especially when it came to ensuring that no one in need was ignored. 
Seven new leaders were appointed to help with this work.  Stephen was one of these additional leaders.  He was described as one who was full of grace and power, who did great signs and wonders among the people.
Stephen was a gifted defender of the early Christian faith and he is said to have won an religious argument one day with some people in the Synagogue of the Freedmen.
//
The key event that lead to today's reading was that Stephen was arrested for preaching against the Temple... blasphemy.
In his defense, Stephen recalled the faith of the people all throughout history: Abraham, Moses, Joshua, David, Solomon. 
Stephen noted that history is filled with examples of prophets of God being persecuted by those opposing the Holy Spirit. 
The implication in Stephen's words was that the current opposition against to the message of Jesus was part of this sad history. 
Stephen's words were pretty harsh to the Temple leaders (Acts 7:52): "You stiff-necked people ... which of the prophets did your ancestors not persecute? They killed those who foretold the coming of the Righteous One, and now you have become his betrayers and murderers."
This personal attack enraged Stephen's opponents and sealed the disciple’s fate.  The Torah punishment for blasphemy is laid out in Leviticus 24:14 - Take the blasphemer outside the camp... and let the whole congregation stone him
As we heard today, that was the end result of Stephen's trial: a crowd-frenzied, public execution.
//
Stephen is sometimes described as the first Christian martyr - killed as a result of his faith in Jesus.
//
//
I would dare to say that - for each of us - there is at least one moment in every single day when we find ourselves at odds with someone else ... a clash of opinions to some degree.
Sometimes, the dispute is significant (maybe even on-going).  Other times, it might just be a situation where we read or see something in the news that runs counter to how we feel.
If you enjoy social media, I am sure that you see things on a daily basis that you might be tempted to respond with an angry face emoji. 

We can find ourselves at odds with aquiantences or strangers.
In extreme cases, some of us avoid conflict at all costs, while others refuse to back down.
Most us pick our battles.
//
A lot of the time, we let the moment pass without really engaging in a debate.  Or maybe you engage a bit, and the counter-reaction is more hostile than you expected, so you disengage.
You may have found yourself governed by one (or more) of the following axioms:
- not worth my time,
- live and let live,
- I shouldn't care more than they do,
- stupid is as stupid does,
- is this really a hill I want to die on?
//
Then again, there are some conflicts that - even the most timid among us - choose not to avoid... times when leaving things unresolved is an undesirable option.
//
As I said, there are some people who are never willing to concede an argument (no matter how weak their position is)... and will keep at it, never admitting defeat or showing any sign of weakness.
I'm not talking about that kind of person (another problem for another day).
What I mean is... that there are times, in each of our lives, when we decide that the stakes are so high, that we are willing to endure potential hard consequences by embroiling ourselves into the midst of conflict.
I see two times that this generally would be the case:
1.    The conflict has broken a relationship that we desperately want to mend, or
2.    It is a matter of principle... a conflict over ideas, ideals: beliefs for which we are not willing to compromise.
Of course, each of these has a full range of degrees to them.  There are levels of conflict and our willingness to be in conflict.
//
Commitment is also fluid.
Our level of commitment to the dispute might change over time.  To borrow an Old Testament phrase, sometimes hard hearts can soften.  Old conflicts might not seem as important after a while.
Who hasn't had cause to say... I can't believe that we let 'that' come between us.
//
//
Conflict involves pain because conflict threatens us with loss.
//
It is a significant decision to willingly go down a path that has almost certain hardship along its way.
The only reason we do this is for some greater good (as we see it).
//
//
//
Early Christians (like John, Peter and Stephen) so fervently believed that the Kingdom of God had come near, that holy forgiveness was the gift of that time, that Jesus of Nazareth was the Messiah, that Jesus had been resurrected from the dead, that - on principle of those beliefs - they would not recant their faith even after arrests, beatings, trials and hurled stones.
//
Not all of the 5000 members of the early church were so committed.  The early chapters of Acts has some stories about how certain members were less than forthright with their involvement.  And certainly, as the decades passed, people began to question aspects of their faith... the New Testament letters often address a call to remain watchful and committed; the entire book of Revelation is written to churches on the brink of giving up (the message being: don't worry... we have already won the battle, the slain lamb is already on the throne).
//
Some - in the early church - had their faith tested more than others... even at the cost of their lives.
//
There is one particular part of the Stephen story that always sticks with me.  As the stones pelted down on him, just before his skull is crushed, he prays for his executors: Lord, do not hold this sin against them
Stephen was so committed to a belief in divine reclamation that (litetally) with his last breath, he preached that gospel.
No wonder he was remembered for his above-and-beyond faithfulness and held up as an example to others in the early church.
//
//
Few of us are face death in relation to our deeply held ideals, beliefs and faith.  In our part of the world, as long as we are not violent or overtly hateful, the worst we might face is being openly scorned or publicly shamed.
This is not true everywhere.
A fear of differences (of ideas or lifestyles) can bring real danger into some people’s lives.
Right now, somewhere on this globe we share, someone is facing death, based simply who they are or on the ideals they profess.
Right now, somewhere on this globe we share, someone is prepared to die, rather than deny themselves or their convictions.
//
Flip this 180° and I suppose you could argue that someone is so committed to what they believe that they are willing to kill for it.  That's the crusades model.
I simply can’t accept these as two sides to the same coin.
Eliminating dissent does not strengthen faith.  A truly strong faith should be able to endure an environment of diverse ideals.
In a different context, Jesus put it this way: If you love only those who love you, what do you gain? (Mt5:46)
If you can’t hold to your faith when others around you disagree, how strong is it, really?
//
//
What is so important to you that you will not back down or recant, no matter the threat?
Where do you imagine that your martyrdom edge is?
//
Maybe you don’t have one.  That's okay… maybe even wise.
Maybe you have several martyrdom edges.
//
I would not expect us to all look at this the same way.
And, I refuse to tell you that you have to be prepared to die for anything.  In that situation, I would far more judgmental toward the one wanting to kill for their beliefs than the one wanting to preserve their life.
//
But, I do think... that taking time to discern what ideas, what relationships, what hopes are truly important to us that we have almost no room for compromise.
I invite us all - in the context of hearing Stephen's story today - to imagine what hill we might be prepared to die on and why.
//
//
// end //
//
//
Let us pray:
God of Grace, Jesus calls us to live love with every fiber of our being.  Be with us and give us courage to endure the times when this ideal is risky.  Amen

#161MV
"I Have Called You By Your Name"


Sunday, May 7, 2017

INSIDE THE GATE

May 7, 2017
Easter 3
John 10:1-10
Acts 2:42-47
(prayer)
If we think about the "Exodus" story from the Old Testament (cf. Charlton Heston in the movie, The Ten Commandments), we can see that (having left behind centuries of slavery in Egypt), when the Israelite people crossed the Jordan River into the land of Canaan, they did so as an identifiable nation of people.
Their tradition was that Canaan was a legitimate ancestral home because it was Jacob's family that had made the move from Canaan to Egypt all those years ago.  The Israelites of the Exodus were the descendants of that one extended family... they identified  (literally) as People of Jacob.
Although Jacob's brood was large in Canaan, they were not a "nation"; they were a family.  The land which Jacob lived on was a family farm and estate, not a "country". 
During the drought that initially led them to Egypt, they left their land.  When they chose not to return and re-settle in Egypt, Jacob's Canaan land could really only be described as abandoned.  No one from that family laid claim to it for centuries.
To say this another way: when the Israelites of the Exodus entered Canaan, they were not "going home", but seeking a new home.  They were a collection of migrants seeking new homes... more than they were a nation establishing a country.
It was their identity as a Jacob's descendants, their faith in Jacob's God, that bound them together, not borders one could draw on a map.
They were bound by attitude not latitude.  Attitude Not Latitude.
//
A further example of this is that when the Israelites took up residence in Canaan, they did not set up a central government to manage the affairs of the nation.  instead, they were governed by the Torah - a Law of God that they had practiced during their years of slavery and had further developed during the 40 year journey between Egypt and Canaan... law made manifest (in part) by the Ten Commandments.
Early Israel had no governors nor kings.  God was their sovereign. 
The Torah/Law was their guide for how a just and faithful society would/should/could function.
//
// pause //
//
About seven weeks after the passover (during which Jesus was risen from the tomb), the disciples gained a special confidence through a unique experience of spirit-led unity. 
We will talk more about that four weeks from today when the Day of Pentecost comes
What I will say today is, on Pentecost:
-where people came from didn't matter...
-the language they spoke did not limit them...
-whether they had known Jesus in the flesh or not didn't exclude them...
-the criticism of the cynics did not dissuade them...
Many, many people were filled by holy presence and it opened their hearts, minds and souls.
To sum up the impact... less than two months after the followers of Jesus had their hearts-of-faith ripped out of their chests as their Lord was hung out to die as a traitor of the empire, now they were publicly praising God and seeing to the goodwill of everyone.
//
As we heard from Acts, the nature of the growing post-pentecost community (which Peter and the others established in Jerusalem) was defined by four basic activities:
·         shared learning,
·         shared fellowship,
·         shared meals,
·         shared prayers.
Whether the early Christians were out in public places (like the temple) or in the privacy of their homes, these community-minded attitudes dominated.
People willingly offered themselves (and all that they knew and held) for the benefit of the whole.
The followers of Jesus believed that they were more together than any of them could be on their own.
Together, they shared insights into faith.  Together, they laughed and cried.  People supported others... and were held up when they were in need.  No one went hungry or was forced to eat alone.  All of this was in the context of communing with God in worship and prayer.
Even more amazing... this was possible with a group that numbered more than 3000 at this point... and increasing!
They devoted themselves to the apostles teaching and fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers.  Awe came upon everyone, because many wonders and signs were being done by the apostles. All who believed were together and had all things in common; they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. Day by day, as they spent much time together in the temple, they broke bread at home and ate their food with glad and generous hearts, praising God and having the goodwill of all the people. And day by day the Lord added to their number those who were being saved.
//
//
The gospel of John offers us a third example of this.  This example is metaphoric rather than literal but it points to the same kind of community known by the Hebrew migrants in Canaan and known the faith seeking Christians in Jerusalem.
//
The fourth gospel presents several metaphors to help the early church of the late first century understand who the Risen Christ was for them.
John's literary style is to present these images in the form of "I Am" statements of Jesus.  Some of these are quite well known and quoted often in church circles:  I Am the bread of life; I Am the Light of the world; I Am the true vine; I Am the resurrection and the life.  If we had read one more verse in John 10, we would have heard Jesus say another one of the familiar phrases... I Am the good shepherd.
But, one of the less-quoted I Am phrases was in the ten verses we heard from John this morning: Jesus said  I Am the gate.
The scene that the gospel writer wants you to picture in your head as you hear Jesus talking is that of a sheep pen.  The flock is safely protected in a space that the good shepherd has prepared.  When they move beyond this sanctuary, they will do so under the caring guidance of the shepherd who - through past experiences - they have learned to trust.
//
I think that John presents this metaphor and expects us to see it from two perspectives.  Certainly, 2000 years of preaching on this passage has tended to go in one of these directions.
1.    The sheep pen is our ultimate destination... or
2.    We are destined to move beyond the pen.
Either, we have found our eternal home in the pen and we need to protect that state of being... or ...the is our place of respite, where we can know that we are held in safety, but that we will leave the pen at times.
//
In the first instance, Jesus is the conduit to the contained environment that is eternal life.  This is traditional Christian salvation theology... to gain entrance into the heavenly pen you've got to get by Jesus first.  This theology also finds support in other parts of the Gospel of John:
John 3:17 God did not send the Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.

John 14:6 I Am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
The first perspective Jesus being the gate for the sheep is that the gate swings inwards.  The goal is to gain entrance into the pen.
//
And then there the other perspective, where the gate still allows for entry, but also swings outward, where the path out into the world is foraged by the good shepherd.  For Jesus' audience, the reality behind the metaphor would have leaned toward this second perspective. 
The first century experience was that most of a flock's time would be spent beyond the pen... nomadically existing in the hills, on pastures and fields, by still waters.  In fact, the confining atmosphere of a sheep pen would be the exception rather than the rule: perhaps because some special care was needed to be offered to part of the flock, or there was some danger to a spread out flock that could be avoided by heading back to the pen.  But when the opportunity to leave the pen arose, it would be taken.
The theology of the second perspective in John 10, is that while we do (from time to rime) seek refuge within our close communities of faith, but that we also venture beyond these sanctuaries trusting that our Christ is a good shepherd beyond the pen as well.
//
Both perspectives can be true.
But more so, I would say that ignoring the second perspective sells us short as a people of faith... especially in the context of the example of the Acts 2 community.
//
As this congregation is fond 9f saying.  It is more than Welcoming In... there is Reaching Out as well.
//
Peter and the early Christians in Acts, did not isolate themselves.  Their life out in the wider world was part of their sharing attitude.  Even John chapter ten recognizes this:
John 10:16 I have other sheep that do not belong to this fold. I must bring them also, and they will listen to my voice. So there will be one flock, one shepherd.
Acts 2:47 says it this way:
 Day by day the Lord added to their number those who were being saved.
//
//
Let me make my point this way...
If the ultimate promise of faith is a safe, eternal existence in a heavenly sheep pen, let's admit that that is not now.  But... that we (like ancient Israelites and early Christians) are be engaged with our world, not set apart from it.
And so...
Enjoy the sanctuary of the pen, when we are inside the gate where we are welcomed and greeted by the good shepherd.
But also, know that as we venture out into the wider pastures (that are also part of God's good work) that we do not leave the essence of the pen behind... The Lord is our shepherd, we have all that we need.  Goodness and mercy journeys with us everywhere we go, every moment of every day.
//
//
Let us pray:

Holy One, you are at the heart of all that we are and all that we can accomplish.  Bless and keep us in your love united.   Amen.

***offering***